Can Investor Activism Boost Small-Cap Stock Performance?

Activist investor interventions with small, newly public corporations can enhance their inventory efficiency, a Monetary Analysts Journal examine finds. In “Shareholder Activism in Small-Cap Newly Public Corporations,” Emmanuel R. Pezier and Paolo F. Volpin analyze a non-public dataset of a UK fund’s engagements with small-cap newly public corporations and exhibit that “behind-the-scenes” engagements resulted in 8% to 10% in cumulative irregular returns. They attribute these returns to engagements, not inventory choosing. 

I spoke with Pezier, an affiliate scholar at Saïd Enterprise Faculty, College of Oxford, for CFA Institute Analysis and Coverage Middle for insights on the authors’ findings and to provide an In Follow abstract of the examine. Under is a evenly edited and condensed transcript of our dialog.

CFA Institute Analysis and Coverage Middle: What’s new or novel about this analysis? 

Emmanuel R. Pezier: I suppose there are two novel parts. First, we examine small-cap lately IPOed corporations. So, the query is, Does the activism “magic” work in small corporations, as we already understand it does in large-cap corporations? And we’re bringing totally new and beforehand personal information into the literature to check that query. Why are small-cap IPOs fascinating? Effectively, they’re crucial to the functioning of the broader economic system, so learning them, their company and liquidity issues, and the way these issues could be resolved by shareholder activism appears worthwhile. 

Second, the activist we examine is very uncommon in the way in which it raises its funds. A conventional activist fund, or common fund, for that matter, raises money from buyers on day one, then makes use of that money over time to put money into corporations that it chooses, utilizing its stock-picking and activist engagement expertise to generate returns. However then the pure query is, How a lot of their returns has to do with their stock-picking capability and the way a lot of it has to do with their activist interventions? In contrast, the fund we examine receives undesirable inventory holdings — for instance, funds in form, moderately than money — from buyers on day one. And, importantly, it has no say wherein shares it receives. Therefore, the returns are unlikely to be as a consequence of inventory choosing, as there may be none, and extra more likely to be as a consequence of activism. So, we get a barely cleaner shot at measuring “how a lot” the activism magic works. 

What motivated you to conduct the examine? 

We puzzled if the form of activism methods which can be utilized by high-profile hedge funds in large-cap corporations occur in small-cap corporations and if they’re efficient in producing returns. And we reply these questions. The reply is sure, they’re, and sure, they’re efficient. 

What are your examine’s key findings?

There are good returns available by participating with the administration of corporations which have lately gone public and which can be small. And the returns attributable to interventions in these small-cap corporations are massive.

We are able to’t actually generalize and say any such activism occurs on a widespread foundation. All we are able to say is that the fund that we examine is intervening behind the scenes and attaining good outcomes, which means that activism works in small-cap shares, like we already understand it does in large-cap shares.

Who needs to be thinking about your examine’s findings, and why? 

I feel anybody who has invested in small-cap IPOs could possibly be on this paper. Massive establishments are being requested to purchase increasingly of those, oftentimes “untimely,” small-cap IPOs due to modifications in inventory market rules geared toward encouraging capital formation in younger, high-growth entrepreneurial corporations. This isn’t going away in the event you’re an institutional investor — if something, you’re more likely to be going through increasingly of those IPOs within the years to come back.

In what methods can the business use the analysis findings? 

The analysis delivers insights into find out how to interact with small corporations which have excessive ranges of insider possession — which means the scope for company conflicts is excessive. These insights needs to be of worth to institutional buyers that routinely put money into small-cap IPOs however would possibly lack expertise in shareholder activism.

What follow-on analysis does your examine encourage or counsel? 

Future researchers could want to look at activist engagements that exploit potential “fault traces,” reminiscent of gender, ethnicity, or nationality, which can exist throughout the board or senior administration. In our examine, we discover that fault traces could exist between the chair and CEO when one of many two is the founding father of the agency and there’s a massive age hole between the 2 people. We imagine these fault traces assist clarify why sure engagements turn out to be confrontational and why confrontational engagements unlock the most important returns.

For extra on this topic, take a look at the complete article, “Shareholder Activism in Small-Cap Newly Public Corporations,” from the Monetary Analysts Journal.

When you preferred this submit, don’t neglect to subscribe to Enterprising Investor and the CFA Institute Analysis and Coverage Middle.

All posts are the opinion of the writer. As such, they shouldn’t be construed as funding recommendation, nor do the opinions expressed essentially replicate the views of CFA Institute or the writer’s employer.

Picture credit score: ©Getty Photographs / Buena Vista Photographs

Skilled Studying for CFA Institute Members

CFA Institute members are empowered to self-determine and self-report skilled studying (PL) credit earned, together with content material on Enterprising Investor. Members can report credit simply utilizing their on-line PL tracker.