The corporate is interesting a latest ruling that rejected its request for a brand new trial. REX has been feuding with Zillow for years now.
Within the newest chapter in a long-running feud, now-defunct low cost brokerage REX has filed a brand new movement that goals to maintain its battle with Zillow alive slightly longer.
REX — often known as Actual Property Alternate — filed the movement Monday. The movement is an attraction to a latest ruling in opposition to REX and is actually pushing for the chance to carry a brand new trial within the firm’s lawsuit in opposition to Zillow. The lawsuit started in 2021 and centered on the apply of holding listings from MLS sources separate from people who don’t come from an MLS.
REX was a reduction brokerage that attempted to bypass the standard a number of itemizing service system and market on to shoppers. The corporate argued within the go well with that Zillow’s apply of holding the listings separate damage REX’s enterprise.
The brand new movement is a response to a January order through which a decide rejected REX’s request for a brand new trial. REX had made the request in November after shedding a jury trial in September. The jury in that trial finally concluded REX didn’t show Zillow used false promoting because it separated non-MLS listings from their MLS counterparts, making them obtainable on a unique web page of its website. The jury additionally stated Zillow proved it was harmless of a second allegation of participating in unfair or misleading acts.
The jury verdict moreover got here just a few weeks after the court docket dismissed all antitrust allegations that have been a part of the lawsuit, which had initially focused each Zillow and the Nationwide Affiliation of Realtors.
The jury choice may have ended the case, and REX has lengthy since ceased to function as a brokerage. Nonetheless, the agency as a substitute opted to press on.
REX’s November request for a brand new trial argued that it was unfairly barred from presenting testimony about actual property commissions to jurors and that the court docket allowed Zillow to “improperly escape legal responsibility” in opposition to false promoting and shopper deception claims.
Nonetheless, the decide rejected these arguments. In his January choice, Decide Thomas Zilly stated that REX was “ably represented, each earlier than and through trial, by a number of attorneys from well-regarded regulation corporations.” The decide additionally stated REX had “greater than enough assets” to pursue the case, and that the corporate’s attorneys had alternatives to file motions, supply proof and do different issues to show their factors.
The outcome, the decide dominated, was that REX’s failure within the go well with wasn’t the results of a “procedural flaw” or an “error on the a part of the court docket” — and so it will not get a brand new trial.
The most recent movement filed Monday asks america Courtroom of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to reverse that call and let the case proceed. Solely time will inform, although, if REX shall be granted the power to combat on.
Learn REX’s newest movement right here:
Electronic mail Jim Dalrymple II